FASB makes targeted change to VIE primary beneficiary test
Defining Issues | October 2016
ASU changes VIE analysis of indirect interests held through related parties under common control. Now on a proportionate basis.
KPMG reports FASB changes on VIE primary beneficiary. ASU changes VIE analysis of indirect interests held through related parties under common control. Now on a proportionate basis.
Applicability
ASU 2016-17
- Company applying ASC Topic 810, as amended by ASU 2015-02
- In applying the consolidation standard to variable interest entities, analyzing indirect interests held through related parties under common control for the purpose of determining whether a decision maker or service provider is the primary beneficiary
Effective dates
Mandatory effective dates and early adoption provisions:
Annual periods:
For public business entities the effective date for annual periods is the fiscal years beginning after Dec. 15, 2016.
For all other entites the effective date for annual periods is the fiscal years beginning after Dec. 15, 2016.
Interim periods:
For public business entities the effective date for interim periods is the fiscal years beginning after Dec. 15, 2016.
For all other entites the effective date for interim periods is the fiscal years beginning after Dec. 15, 2017.
Key Impacts:
- Amendments to FASB ASC Topic 810
| How a decision maker or service provider considers indirect interests held through related parties under common control | ||
|---|---|---|
| Consolidation step | Current US GAAP | ASU |
| Determine whether a decision marker's fee is a variable interest | Consider interests held by these related parties in their entirety | No change |
| If the fee is a variable interest, determine whether the decision maker is the primary beneficiary of the variable interest entity (VIE) | Consider interests held by these related parties in their entirety | Consider interests held by related parties on a proportionate basis |
- ASU 2016-17 makes it less likely that a single decision maker will individually meet the characteristics to be the primary beneficiary of the VIE
- However, ASU 2016-17 makes it more likely that a related party tiebreaker test will be required. The tiebreaker test is required when the single decision maker and its related parties under common control collectively meet the characteristics to be the VIE’s primary beneficiary
Report contents
- Summary of differences between current US GAAP and ASU 2016-17
- Example showing the effect of the amendments
- Effective date
Download the document:
FASB makes change to VIE test
Download PDFSubscribe to stay informed
Receive the latest financial reporting and accounting updates with our newsletters and more delivered to your inbox.
Accounting Research Online
Access our accounting research website for additional resources for your financial reporting needs.